By Dominik Fry, P.E., | Engineered Software, Inc.
Proper pump selection is more important than ever, with drastic consequences on maintenance, reliability, and efficiency. The selection process remains difficult for average users, and even contracting the work out to a reputable engineering firm does not guarantee success. In this article, we will cover centrifugal pump design, common pitfalls in the selection process, and consequences of improper selection.
Centrifugal pump technology has been around for without any revolutionary changes. Sure, there are new alloys and coatings to make the casings and impellers from, and efficiencies have increased. However, the basic design remains largely unchanged. Unlike other twenty first century technologies, a centrifugal pump dating 100 years ago, is nearly identical to modern designs. If anything, the older designs are more robust with the current competitive market -forcing pump manufacturers to cut costs by eliminating excess material in their designs.
A pump from a reputable manufacturer may perform poorly in a system regardless of the actual pump’s specific quality. A pump made from titanium and designed to NASA specifications for a 30 year life cycle, while expensive, could perform inadequately for another industrial application. Therefore, it is crucial to fit the right pump to the right application. To understand why this occurs, let’s dig into the basic operating points of centrifugal pumps.
As the pump shaft spins, it turns the impeller inside the casing which adds energy into the process fluid. This allows the impeller to act as a cantilever with a wear ring, seals, and bearings that keep everything in place and fluid from leaking out. The spinning impeller changes the incoming fluid’s direction which can cause intense radial loads on the pump. The bearings not only reduce rolling friction, but also support the pump shaft and absorb these radial loads. This may be seen in a detailed view of a centrifugal pump in Figure 1.
All pumps have a design point where the efficiency is maximized, called the Best Efficiency Point (BEP). This is where the pump runs the smoothest and radial forces are minimized. The further away from the BEP, the higher the radial loads on the pump. The pump will generally have a critical speed around 25% over the BEP where its natural frequency is reached and excessive vibration may occur. The pump will essentially shake itself apart, first going through the wear ring, then the seals, and finally the bearings. This is easy to spot; the pump will vibrate and may begin leaking fluid far before any scheduled maintenance. This is akin to driving a car with the wheels out of balance. If mud or ice is stuck to one side of the rim causing an imbalance, the car may run fine at 25mph in the city. However, as the speed increases it will reach a point where the impulses from the wheels will work in tandem with the vehicles shock absorbers, causing the entire vehicle to shake until the offending speed is passed.
Pump curves demonstrate the strong relationship between pump life, pump reliability, and where the pump operates on its curve.
The performance of individual pumps, is a combination of the pump design and the operating conditions. The pump’s performance data is provided to the user in the form of pump curves, whose primary function is to communicate or define the relationship between the flow rate and total head for a specific pump. They are provided by the manufacturer and show the operating characteristics of a specific pump type, size, and speed based on results of standardized tests and test conditions. A healthy pump maintains the defined relationship between the head and flow at all times.
The pump curve is required for
- Proper pump selection– Using a pump curve will ensure the pump selected is matched to the system requirements.
- Monitoring the health of the pump– If the pump is not operating on the published curve then something is wrong.
- Troubleshooting the operation of the entire piping system– The pump provides energy into the system, and knowing the energy going in is a critical clue for identifying issues. Without a pump curve it is extremely difficult to determine what is causing a problem in the system and what should be done to correct the problem.
For accuracy, it is critical to have a pump curve for every pump.
Figure 2 shows a stylized pump curve in black with efficiency in green. As mentioned earlier, the peak or maximum efficiency on the pump curve is indicated with a point called the Best Efficiency Point, or BEP. To operate on the BEP, the system must either control the pressure at the outlet of the pump or the flow through the system to keep the pump operating point (indicated by the red arrow on that spot.
For example, if the system causes the pressure at the discharge to surpass the pressure at the BEP, the operating point will move to the left up the curve and flow will reduce; if the system causes the pressure at the pump’s discharge to drop the operating point will move down and to the right.
Moving to the left or right of the BEP causes forces on the impeller to increase, and these forces cause stresses which have a significant negative effect on the life and reliability of the pump.
If we overlay the expected life of the pump as a function of where the pump is operating, we get a “Barringer Curve”, which shows the Mean Time Between Failure as a function of BEP flow rate. This curve was created by Barringer & Associates in a study of seal failures in centrifugal pumps.
Using the curve above, the closer the pump is operated to its BEP, the greater the mean time between failures. As the operating flow rate of the pump moves farther to the left or right of the BEP, the failures occur more frequently.
Mean time between failure cuts in half when the pump is running 20% below the BEP or 10% above it as shown. When operated to the left of the BEP, problems like high temperature rise, low flow cavitation, bearing problems, reduced impeller life, suction and discharge recirculation are leading causes of seal failure and pump downtime. To the right of the BEP, bearing and seal life are effected, and cavitation problems occur.
The key takeaways are understanding how the system impacts the pump on its curve and the reliability and life of the pump increases when the pump operates near the BEP.
Cavitation is a major concern when pumping; it can demolish pumps very quickly. If there is a low intake pressure, or the pump is operating at the far end of its curve, it pulls the fluid through so rapidly that the fluid pressure drops below its vapor pressure and can cause it to boil.
For example, at sea level water boils at 212F. The top of Mount Everest – where the pressure is much lower – boils at 160F. In a pump, the pressure may drop low enough that water “boils” at 60F, or whatever the ambient temperature may be. It may seem difficult for air to strip away steel in a pump. In fact, it’s the millions of vapor bubble creations and implosions that can eat away the pump. This effect is clear once the pump is in operation and can sound like gravel being pumped – no matter the base fluid. For this reason, spending extra money on an oversized pump, may cost more money in maintenance and repairs.
Because the individual process piping is generally unknown, engineers tend to oversize pumps. They do not know exactly how a contractor will route pipes, and thus include a safety factor in the calculations. This safety factor generally goes on top of the worst-case design scenario. The engineering firms are incentivized by the fact that they do not want to be blamed for an undersized pump if it is not able to meet the process requirements. Imagine the outrage and damage to a firm’s reputation if their clients did not get adequate water pressure from a shower, cooling from the HVAC, or flow from the sewers.
A general rule of thumb for safety factors is 10%. The junior engineer will generally assume a certain amount of required energy based on the expected piping, process, and control elements, and then add 10% to this number. A senior engineer may review the work and add an additional 10% as well. Things continue to get more complicated as end users may have unrealistic expectations for production capacity given the desired high numbers, or may want the infrastructure in place for a potential expansion years down the road. When the pump is finally ordered, the manufacturer’s representative will help select a pump that is large enough to handle these operations and then some. These safety factors end up compounding on each other leaving the actual process something totally different than that which was required. This may leave the end user saddled with an inefficient pump and the possibility of hundreds of thousands of dollars in additional energy and maintenance. This is why using software to model expected flow conditions at various operating points is highly recommended.
Real World Results
According to the Hydraulic Institute’s “Pumping System Optimization”, an evaluation of 1690 pumps at 20 process plants discovered some alarming results. They found the average pumping efficiency to be below 40%. On top of that, over 10% of pumps from that study were less than 10% efficient. A major cause was found to be improper pump selection. General rule is that a pump and motor combo will cost about $1 per day, per horsepower of the motor. While energy costs vary by location, this is a good starting point to begin understanding what potential costs you are facing. For larger horsepower pumps running inefficiently the wasted capital is staggering. Energy costs alone are seldom cause for change, much less transformation of an industry. Once the pumps are installed and running the energy costs are out of sight and out of mind. There are many other costs in industrial facilities, and discovering the true cost of the pump is hard when it is buried in an industrial energy bill alongside the high costs of heating, cooling, and running of the equipment.
There are additional benefits from an optimized system than just energy savings. Process quality and quantity for starters. In many instances, systems have been left alone, because they work, and managers do not want to endanger the process. This works if you are satisfied with the status quo, however slight changes to the system may result in sizeable increases in production throughput. When looked at on a timeframe of many years, these changes produce dramatic results.
Reliability and reduced maintenance generates some of the biggest savings when the pumping system is running correctly. From the Barringer curve we can see that we must operate close to the pumps BEP in order to maximize our efficiency and mean time between failure of the pump. Reputable pump manufacturers design their pumps to operate for 20 plus years of operation if done correctly, yet end users are often satisfied with just 5 years. Costs are also easier to track in parts and labor. The savings opportunity from better maintenance and reliability alone, warrants a second look at your pumps and systems.
To view the tear sheet from Pumps & Systems Magazine, click here.